Phil Woolas specifically names the Muslim Public Affairs Committee UK (MPACUK) as these extremists in the "Saddleworth and Oldham - The Examiner" leaflet which triggered the historic legal proceedings against him. Sure enough, MPACUK were openly campaigning for a vote for Watkins to defeat Woolas.
MPACUK have been praised for their work in getting British Muslims involved in mainstream politics and the promotion of women's rights within Islam. While MPACUK subscribe to jihad as a religious duty, they encourage this via democratic means rather than violence. The most extreme view that MPACUK promotes is anti-Zionism, which some argue has crossed the line into anti-Semitism. So it is arguable that MPACUK are extremists in this specific context.
This is the image from the Woolas "Saddleworth and Oldham - The Examiner" leaflet:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ee80/1ee805e88545e5023c183449f075914f9cc0c49e" alt=""
So Woolas called MPACUK extremists, and illustrated Muslim extremists using an image from a extremist protest that MPACUK opposed. This is highly deceptive. It gives entirely the wrong impression of the Muslims who were campaigning against Woolas, or the Muslims that he asserted Watkins was wooing.
2 comments:
Did woolas provide any leaflets that mpac delivered that supported watkin? I have never seen any. I did see some anti woolas stuff on the website. But that's not really the same is it?
I also haven't seen any of the leaflets distributed by MPACUK.
Post a Comment